Reason 10.3 specs
- #REASON 10.3 SPECS HOW TO#
- #REASON 10.3 SPECS UPGRADE#
- #REASON 10.3 SPECS CODE#
- #REASON 10.3 SPECS PC#
Personally i am using Intel for the last 13 years but my next computer (this summer) is Ryzen 3000++ new series. 39367.html - seems to be great thing on AMD field - for all AMD users.
#REASON 10.3 SPECS HOW TO#
Apple just released they own article on how to disable HT on Mac computers but they reported users will loose up to 40% of performance.ĪFAIK only exception of the Whiskey Lake (ULT refresh), Whiskey Lake (desktop) which are immune. It's not like Spectre it's even way worse. 39333.html - this MDS flaw is only three days old. Which will cripple performance up to 40% ?!!!?!?! Any Intel CPU from 2008 to this day. But I have no issues running at a 64 buffer right now and I don't want to invest w/o really knowing REAL WORLD, if that makes sense.īe warned if someone try to sell you older Intel CPU.
#REASON 10.3 SPECS UPGRADE#
Currently, all I have is a 4770k and I'd LOVE to upgrade to Ryzen. I have to admit, I really don't know what the story is but it's like a little alarm in my head. I realise that sounds somewhat contradictory considering that the 3rd gen Ryzen isn't out yet, but trust me, there is a method to my madness. The end result is always a rock solid system that handles anything I throw at it.
I assemble all my PCs from scratch, and I always do deep research when selecting components. I tried to search the forum and didn't find anything recent. I'm just trying to figure out how well 10.3 is playing with Ryzen. I have no idea if AMD was able to address this in the new upcoming chips, but it would be nice if they could. This was evident in the first gen Ryzen, the second gen Ryzen, as well as all Threadrippers. That's not to say you can't use Ryzen at low audio sample buffers - it's just that Intel will allow you to run more plugins at that same audio sample buffer. It was mentioned earlier in this thread that working at low audio sample buffers on Ryzen doesn't perform as well as Intel. Intel, just due to sheer number of users, will be a priority still for few years to come to ensure compatibility, so that's why I'm recommending it. The problem is, there might be some architectural changes Reason isn't ready for and there's no way of knowing. It may impact my decision.Īnd how do you expect us to know how Reason plays with CPUs to be announced in 2 weeks? But if Ryzen doesn't play nice with Reason, I need to know.
#REASON 10.3 SPECS PC#
The bottom line is my PC is not dedicated to Reason. I can't see myself getting a 16 core, but an 8 or 12 core would be nice. The rumours suggest higher clock speeds, higher IPC, and up to 16 cores, 32 threads in the consumer variants. In about two weeks AMD will be announcing their new CPU product line and I'll be watching this launch like a hawk. Current AMD Ryzen CPUs are "almost" on par with Intel.
It's the reason I went with the 3770k six+ years ago.
#REASON 10.3 SPECS CODE#
Intel has been the safer choice from a raw performance perspective since the code 2 duo. It's just that Intels are a safer choice, IMO Perhaps I should make it clearer that I'm not saying AMD processors will be bad or won't work well in Reason. Intels will typically have better single-threaded performance, even though the processor as a whole (for multi-threaded benchmarks) might be weaker - for example: So I'd say unless for some reason you're dead set for AMD, I'd go for an Intel CPU like i7-8700k or one of the newer ones if your budget allows. As an analogy, it's better to move house with 2 trucks than 10 hatchbacks, even though - technically - they might have the same cubic space available in total. This is especially valid for Reason, where we tend to create complex, elaborate, interweaving and cross-dependant setups rarely seen in "linear" DAWs like Cubase, Logic or Studio One. In short, the more cores you have, the lower their individual clock and thus bigger chance for any of them to be choked by a single long / heavy chain of devices that cannot be broken down into parallel jobs. For a DAW - any DAW - single-threaded performance is most important, even though they'll use all the cores you throw at them theoretically.